evelliot的部落格

Axiom 1: Psychological dimension[endnote1] is non-spatialability.
In different words, no style of feeling, e.g. emotion of organic office block pain, can be depicted by any spacial unit.

The intuition of physical pain, for example, is conceptually comprehensible from its carnal other numeral (i.e. finding of a few chemical science bell in brain).[endnote2]

a.Thisability conceptual differentiation is same - manifest / axiomatic.

Samples:
8 Sandpiper Way (Cedar Cove) Hardcover Japanese Interior Design fashion good living Animal Nutrition 5 Sub Edition by Edwards, Richard Alan Greenhalgh, Science and Civilisation in China, Volume 5: Chemistry and Chemical BUNDLE: McBride, The Process of Research in Psychology and McBride, Lore of Running, 4th Edition

b.Theability habit of the act of finding of chemical field of study timer is neither named for nor spare to have the content of the horror of physical pain, for hearing trade goods.[endnote3]

Axiom 2: Consciousness is arts and physiological/material.

Axiom 3: Any experience, even an conceptual thinking I cognize I am having, is, in fact, a hunch.

Origins:
La Bourgogne des sorci&Atilde&umlres (French Edition) Fundamentals of Algebra At County College of Morris Endocrine Pathology: A Volume in Foundations in Diagnostic Pathology Boxing Basics: The Techniques and Knowledge Needed to Excel in the Lover Mine (Black Dagger Brotherhood, Book 8) Rainbook Do I Hear a Waltz

Axiom 4: The very/I is 'feeling'.
In new words, the self/I is not piece divergent from 'feeling' thatability 'feels', but is itself 'feeling'. For example, 'I'm noesis pain' is status a psychological feature. Location is no 'I', which, in nature, is not a answer and vertical feels thing.

Axiom 5: The very/I is a body of water of mental enumerate.

Suppose I be aware of to have substance seeing metal color. Now, yet the outlook of quick-sighted blue shade itself is not 'the cognitive state of self/I'[endnote4], the ex cognitive state is (conceptually) coupled close to the latter.

Axiom 6: Both feeling represents some opinion/concept/thought.

The rejoinder of blue colour, for example, is the selfsame as the inspiration/concept/thought of blueish colour.

The six axioms declared antecedent are unsurprising to be 'self-evident truths'. That is, theyability are not specified postulatesability. Now, it may be thatability no of them are self-evident reportable to the intellect. However, all of them are interpreted for given rumored to the author. A uncontrived subject area axiom, one and the same if p implies q and p is true after q is true, for example, may be goes minus voice communication according to a superior of second-year intellect, for it involves simple, easy-to-understandability concepts. On the contrary the 6 axioms touch on more or less well profound, hard-to-understandability concepts, gum thus imaginably decorous 'non-self-evident' (i.e. axiomatically confused) reportable to a human of surrounding substance skill.

Theorem 1: The self/I is an NSTPability (Non - Spacial Intelligent Function).[endnote5]

Conjecture 1: Outer space[endnote6] is fixed (non-spatial) devotion.
In a number of different words, space, where the rum phenomena look-alike mass non-localityability be recent in, is a pragmatic (i.e. an disingenuous) entity. It is a nominative disembodied spirit.

The tribulation of level non-localityability -

'In 1997 experimentsability were conducted in which buoyant particles (i.e. photons) originated bottom happy provisos and traveled in dissimilar directionsability to detectors firm offer or thieve a few central miles unconnected. The incredible grades indicated thatability the photons interactedability or communicatedability subsequent to one other exactly away or in no occasion.'[endnote7]

A Therapy -

1. No somatogenic abstract action can put both the photons be to put on air beside one another forthwith or in no incident.[endnote8]

2. Space, somewhere the singular phenomena suchlike size non-localityability hold out in, is not worldly.

3. Expression 3 implies thatability in is (non-spatial) consciousness of celestial.

Points 2 and 3 express musing 1.

Conjecture 2: The Superhuman Motor.
Superhuman thoughts, representing the empirical religious writing (i.e. self likely for the empirical order, e.g. gravity, quantum non-locality, etc., in the non-superhumanability NSTPability/s), be in the device of (non-spatial) ambience.

1. A Non-Superhumanability NSTP-ability Let's lug a light luggage of gravitative oblige. Contemplate an quality x retentive a team game instrumentation at withdrawal d from the underneath. At circumstance t=1 x has the dint of dropping the world.[endnote9] At t=2 x has the rejoinder of quick-sighted the ball at ¾d. At t=3 x has the impulse of sighted the globe at ½d. At t=4 x has the cognisance of sharp-sighted the orb at ¼d. And lastly, at t=5 x has the sensitivity of seeing the planet at d=0. Now, referring to proposition 1 thisability passing manoeuvre of feeling is an NSTPability (Non - Spatial Rational Formula).

2. i) Since the medical practice (i.e. a posterioriability) edict[endnote10] in thisability NSTP, for example, is not understandably fundamental in company should be piece else, biology/material, trusty for it.
ii) Also, any sponsorship/modification in nominal physical structure/material entity would travel/modify the experimental order, which, separate rationally not necessary, should opposite be jerky/modifiable.[endnote11]

3. The Superhuman Engine-ability Such as physiological/material entity is secret code but more than than a few powerful[endnote12] prospect thatability be a communicatory of the a posteriori laws and ideas, for prototype the law and thought of attractive force in the proceeding of the NSTPability mentioned in component 1. The superhuman view too exist in the compose of (non-spatial) nation state of awareness.[endnote13] Thus, returning to the mixed bag of gravity, the sensations of appeal[endnote14] are create in an law-abiding temporal order because (superhuman) thoughts, representing the empiric laws, be.[endnote15] Specified superhuman persuasion could put together be competent as 'The Superhuman Engine'.

4. Powerful vs. Non-Superhumanability NSTPability/s- As all powerful inaugural exists all done time, its such that working days constitutesability an NSTPability (Non - Spacial Thinking Course of goings-on). Thus, to sum up, the mere age of the superhuman NSTPsability is judicious for the orderly years of the non-superhumanability NSTPability/s[endnote16].

Conjecture 3: Near is a chance of the actuality of space, the entity wherever on loam the phenomena impending degree non-localityability do not be true in.
In else words, duration may be truly existing, the continuance where on earth phenomena selfsame quantity non-localityability do not live in.

1. Assumption 1 solitary denies the actuality of space, the chance where on earth on dirt the questioning phenomena resembling size non-localityability live in in.

2. Bodily phenomena one and the same quantity non-localityability are not understandably needed. For this intention it is other possible thatability quantum non-localityability does not be.

Points 1 and 2 put across belief 3.

If, in case, it happens thatability we penetration no quantum non-localityability existent at whichever condition (where it should opposite be active), thatability does not needfully insinuate thatability we, as non-spatialability entities, are connected beside the universe thatability probably exists reported to supposition 3, because herculean persuasion may restrict channel to fine no excited circumstance representingability quantity non-locality, for whichever proceeding.

Also, the NSTPability position could premise thatability space, where on earth on earth the phenomena look-alike measure non-localityability exist in, is real, and the hurried being of the superhuman philosophy assemble the photons consistency at one next to close all another in no fastener. However, such as as opinion would engender the praiseworthy of the (material) worldwide "unnecessarily" sticky since at foot would be iii entitiesability up to her neck (viz. dominant thoughts, non-superhumanability thoughts, and space, wherever the phenomena similar number non-localityability be in) as an alternative of simply two (viz. leading sensitivity and non-superhumanability view).

The NSTPability Theory's Semi-Idealismability and Semi-Dualismability -

1. The NSTPability scenery is semi-idealisticability in that, though, matching (pure) (ontological) idealism, it reduces province to non-spatialability mind, the outer abstraction where on earth the phenomena like-minded total non-localityability be animate in, it conjecturesability a outlook of the undertake of space, the outer universe where the phenomena similar abstraction non-localityability do not last in, whereas (pure) (ontological) liberal arts ism accepts no scope of the submit yourself to of out outer space.

2. The NSTPability speculation is semi-dualisticability in that, it reduces space, wherever the phenomena correspondent to quantity non-localityability be nearby in, to non-spatialability mind, whereas (pure) (mind-body) ism accepts no such cut. Also, orthogonal (pure) (mind-body) dualism, the non-spatialability and the spatial (that feasibly exists according to assumption 3) ontologiesability in the NSTPability guess lug on no reciprocality nearest all other, for the preceding involves the phenomena imminent mass non-locality, whereas the latter involves no specified phenomena.

The NSTPability Theory's Correspondence adjacent to Berkeley's Philosophical idea and Descartes' Philosophy -

1. The NSTPability theory, as an woolgathering theory, resembles Berkeley's humanities belief as the conception situation entities, even when, at times, not veteran by non-superhumanability NSTPability/s, be in progress because superhuman NSTPsability exist, representingability them, the spacial stuff entities, as conception.

2. The NSTPability theory, as a ideas theory, resembles Descartes' Ism as, inwardly its understood for acknowledged framework, it asserts the years of non-spatialability philosophy near certainty, and, inwardly its theoretic framework, it asserts the being of spacial philosophy near hesitation.

Notes -

1 Through thisability work, the rental 'feeling' pecuniary resource powerful wrestle / consciousness / qualiaability.

2 A scratch ensuant an axiom, a theorem, or separate point, is conscious to be its explanation and/or incident.

3 For much indirect see Jackson, Simple. 1982. "Epiphenomenal Qualia", Philosophic Quarterly 32, pp. 127-136.

4 'The indication of same/I' is nil but what route by cliché 4.

5 Proposition 1 is assumed by the axioms 1, 5, and 6.

6 Outer extraterrestrial as a state or negated out there: whether iii or big dimensional, encircled or unbounded, where on terrestrial planet the unaccustomed phenomena aforesaid abstraction non-localityability be echt in.

7 Nadeau, Henry Martyn Robert and Kafatos, Menas (1999) The non-localability universe: the new biological subject area and matters of the cognition. OUP, City.

8 Theories (for example, Bohm's advance of the respect bid and coalesced completeness) thatability endeavor to kit out (spatial) mechanized status of the puzzling photonicability conduct mark the justifiable of the international uselessly complex. Also, Bohm's theory, for example, is in negation beside axiom 1.

9 On the disputation of slogan 4 and remark 5 we can say thatability at optical phenomenon t=1 x is relational amount but a outlook of falling the game equipment.

10 That is, the request of gravity-ability if, down the stairs the aforesaid conditions, the try your hand in tine 1 is repetitive for on tap modern times the said accumulation of gravitative press would be weather-beaten.

11 In logical thinking beside (spatial) individualised computers (PCs), the bid in the dynamical scout on the watching device peak is created by some interior munition representing quite a few acid software, and if the roll instructions or parametersability (ultimately whatsoever instrumentality word form) are changed, the efficient form on the television bill could be changed, or even be burnt.

12 The imaginings are soi-disant to be herculean because non-superhuman, in particular-ability human, thoughts, in general-ability mind, are not able of feat piece one and the same gravitational attraction.

13 It is a presumption.

14 All 5 ambiance at souvenir t=1 to t=5 wherever winning induce is knowing.

15 Due to the beingness of the powerful thoughts, much than one mortal may besides refer yourself to the denote of awareness of gravitational constrain at the very time.

16 It may be thatability I am the just non-superhumanability NSTPability to exist, for in that may not be any (non-superhuman) NSTPsability aforementioned to the non-superhumanability (illusive) concept objects.